The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous because the petitioner did not appear and no one appeared for the parties.
The petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 552 of 2010
Petitioner :- Devi Nandan Lal @ Raju Respondent :- Principal Judge Family Court Kanpur Nagar And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Pratap Pal Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one has appeared for the parties.
It appears that the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.2.2022 Anurag/-
Digitally signed by ANURAG KUMAR VERMA Date: 2022.02.22 17:26:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Nandan Lal @ Raju
Principal Judge Family Court Kanpur Nagar
Salil Kumar Rai
Anurag Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
