Petitioner withdrew petition under Article 227 without resistance. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4014 of 2022
Petitioner :- Deepak Chaudhary Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Narayan Singh,Ram Bahadur Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Shashi Dhar Sahai
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai,counsel for opposite party No. 2 (Bank).
After addressing some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
In view of the above statement, the present petition under Article 227 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to counsel for the petitioner as per Rules.
Order Date :- 27.5.2022 KU
Digitally signed by KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI Date: 2022.05.27 15:58:40 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Chaudhary
State of U.P.
Bank
Rajiv Gupta
Kalim Uddin Siddiqui
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
