Allowed

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Home Lucknow

Allahabad HC7 Mar 2022/973/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court allowed the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 2 lacs and two sureties of the like amount, effective across ten pending cases, relying on a Supreme Court judgment, without requiring 20 sureties.

What did the court decide?

Permitted the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 2 lacs and two sureties of the like amount as valid surety for all ten cases.

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy. Home… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 13

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 973 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Home Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been released on bail in following cases:-

¶7

Case Crime No.417 of 2021 under section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶8

Case Crime No.418 of 2021 under section 25(1-B) Arms Act, P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶9

Case Crime No.419 of 2021 under section 3 Explosive Substance Act, P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶10

Case Crime No.415 of 2021 under section 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶11

Case Crime No.381of 2021 under section 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶12

Case Crime No.232 of 2021 under section 357, 380 I.P.C., P.S. Mahmoodabad, district Sitapur.

¶13

Case Crime No.376 of 2021 under section 392, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Ram Kot, district Sitapur.

¶14

Case Crime No.375 of 2021 under section 380, 457 I.P.C., P.S. Sidhauli, district Sitapur.

¶15

Case Crime No.400 of 2021 under section 380, 457 I.P.C., P.S.Sidhauli, district Sitapur.

¶16

Case Crime No.408 of 2021 under section 380 I.P.C., P.S. Sidhauli, district Sitapur.

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to poor financial condition, the applicant is not in a position to manage twenty sureties in all ten cases.

¶18

As such, he seeks the benefit of judgment passed by Hon'be Supreme Court of India in "Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of U.P." passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 8914-8915 of 2018.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid, it is provided that the applicant may furnish a personal bond of Rs.two lacs and two sureties each of the like amount, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases above mentioned in which the bail orders have been passed.

¶20

With these observations this application under Section 482 Cr.P.c. is disposed of.

¶21

Order Date :- 7.3.2022 kkb/

¶22

Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL Date: 2022.03.08 10:13:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Home Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Home Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Rathore Vs State of U.P.

Shrawan Kumar Trivedi Vs State of U.P through Principal Secretary, Home Civil Secretariate , U.P, Lucknow and Another

Abhishek Kumar Dwivedi and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Civil Sectt and Another

Umesh Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy Home Deptt and Another

Amit Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Alok Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Civil Sectt