This criminal revision challenged a Family Court order awarding Rs.3,000/- monthly maintenance to the revisionist's wife, alleging excessiveness. The revision court held the amount meager and rejected the quashing prayer.
Revision dismissed; petitioners allowed to apply for modification under Section 126(2) CrPC if circumstances change.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 957 of 2019
Revisionist :- Ankit Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Dharamendra Kumar,Ashok Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022 MVS/-
Digitally signed by MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Date: 2022.08.04 18:39:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court awarding Rs.3,000/- monthly maintenance constitutes an excessive award warranting interference by the revision court.
Whether the revisionist has a valid ground to quash the maintenance order due to inability to pay.
What remedy is available to the revisionist if circumstances change after the order.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
