Disposed

Tusar Pandey and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Aug 2022/5417/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings, arising from alleged offenses under sections 147, 323, 452, 506 IPC. The applicant sought to withdraw the application. The court disposed of the application, granting liberty to file a regular bail application, to be decided in light of specific Supreme Court judgments.

What the court decided

AI extract

Tusar Pandey and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 14

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5417 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Tusar Pandey And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivekanand Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶5

Sri Mohit Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vivekanand Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Diwakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4003 of 2021, (State Vs. Arun Pandey and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 90 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 452, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Jamo, District- Amethi, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 29, Sultanpur.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that Tushar Pandey, Chanki Pandey, Tinshu Pandey @ Ritik Pandey applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the chargesheet have been submitted against them.

¶8

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶9

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

¶10

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 17.8.2022 Ishan

¶11

Digitally signed by ISHAN JAISWAL Date: 2022.08.18 09:52:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Tusar Pandey and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Tusar Pandey and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhinav Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and Anr.

Ramdaras and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Anshu Bhadauria @ Ajeet Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Saleem and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Balram and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Smt. Sayama Bano Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home, Lko.