The High Court rejected a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a rape case (IPC 376, POCSO) where fact witnesses had already been examined. The Court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within four months.
Bail application rejected; trial to conclude within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11147 of 2020
Applicant :- Deepak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar,Suresh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 24.5.2022 prateek
Digitally signed by PRATEEK ARORA Date: 2022.05.24 14:32:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to bail in a rape case under Section 376 IPC/POCSO Act after witnesses have been examined.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Deepak
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Prateek Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
