Neetu Devi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Allahabad found the writ petition infructuous and dismissed the same based on the petitioner's own submission.
The High Court of Allahabad found the writ petition infructuous and dismissed the same based on the petitioner's own submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9639 of 2021
Petitioner :- Neetu Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Prakash,Vimal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel appeared for the University.
Order Date :- 23.7.2021 V.S.Singh
Neetu Devi
State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court