Petitioner sought compensation for land possession by the State. Court held that no further direction was needed as a committee was already constituted in a related case and ordered disposal of all applications before that authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Additional Cause List Serial No. 347
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9090 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ami Chand Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Paras Nath Rai, Advocate for respondent no. 4, Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Issue raised in the present petition is that possession of a portion of the land was taken by the State. However, till date, no compensation has been paid. As there were numerous cases being filed before this Court raising similar issue, the State had constituted a Committee vide Government Order dated May 12, 2016.
Let the petitioner/s also file representation before the Committee in terms of the order dated November 2, 2021 passed by this Court in Writ C No. 25425 of 2021 (Ram Kailash Nishad Vs. State of U.P. and others) in which direction has been issued to the authority concerned to dispose of all pending applications upto February 18, 2022.
Considering the aforesaid fact, no further direction is required to be issued in this case, except that the authority concerned shall abide by the directions already issued and it shall dispose of all the applications including the one already filed or to be filed by the petitioner/s.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Date :- 16.12.2021 Shiraz/Rahul Dwivedi
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions are needed to constitute a committee for compensation since a similar order was already passed in a related case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram Kailash Nishad Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶8
Writ C No. 25425 of 2021 (Ram Kailash Nishad Vs. State of U.P. and others)
Ami Chand
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
