Anil Pratap Narain Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to unmute their microphone or switch on their camera during the video conference.
A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to unmute their microphone or switch on their camera during the video conference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8188 of 2021
Petitioner :- Anil Pratap Narain Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioner's counsel Sri A.P. Singh joined the Video Conferencing platform but neither unmute his microphone nor switched on his camera.
No request was made to seek adjournment on ground of any technical difficulty.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 Bhaskar
Anil Pratap Narain Singh
State Of U.P.
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court