Rajveer Singh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner lacks personal interest in the land, with permission to file a PIL instead.
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner lacks personal interest in the land, with permission to file a PIL instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8102 of 2021
Petitioner :- Rajveer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subedar Mishra,Shailesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mushir Khan
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioner has no personal interest in the land from which he seeks removal of encroachment and therefore the prayer as made in this petition can appropriately be address in a Public Interest Litigation.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a Public Interest Litigation, if so advised.
Order Date :- 14.7.2021. Rks.
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court