Writ petition dismissed because the petitioners failed to disclose the provision, statute, or rule under which their representation was submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8006 of 2021
Petitioner :- Padam Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Tomar,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nipun Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The prayer in this petition is that a decision may be taken by the respondents 2 and 3 on the representation submitted by the petitioners.
There is no disclosure in the petition as to under which provision or Statute or Rule such representation has been made.
In view of the above, we find ourselves unable to accept the prayer of the petitioners therefore this petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 15.7.2021 Sunil Kr Tiwari
Padam Singh And Another
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
