dismissed as infructuous. The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner's term as Block Pramukh had expired, rendering the matter infructuous by the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6966 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt.Anamika Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Yadav,Prem Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.
Sri Bhola Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the term of the petitioner as Block Pramukh has expired and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous by passage of time.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 28.6.2021/vkg
Smt. Anamika Yadav
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
