This single-judge writ petition sought a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution to dispose of Arbitration Case No. 1165 of 2019 expeditiously. The Court ordered the respondent to decide the case within three months.
Direction to the respondent No.1 to decide Arbitration Case No. 1165 of 2019 expeditiously within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6823 of 2021
Petitioner :- Bhola Respondent :- Arbitrator/ District Magistrate And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The solitary relief that the petitioner seeks in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is a direction to the respondent No.1, Arbitrator/District Magistrate, Ghazipur to decide the Arbitration Case No. 1165 of 2019 (Bhola Vs. Competent Authority and another) expeditiously.
Taking into consideration the nature of relief sought by the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the matter, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the Arbitration Case No. 1165 of 2019 expeditiously, however, not later than three months from the date of communication of this order.
Petition stands disposed of finally in the above terms.
Order Date :- 19.3.2021 sfa/
(Jayant Banerji, J) (Sanjay Yadav, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent Arbitrator/District Magistrate should be directed to decide the pending arbitration case expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhola
Arbitrator/ District Magistrate Ghazipur
And 3 Others
Sanjay Yadav
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
