Harendra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5786 of 2021…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5786 of 2021…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5786 of 2021
Petitioner :- Harendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajkapoor Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned Standing Counsel.
By the instant petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:
“ Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned court below i.e. respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the Appeal No. 344/429, (State and another Vrs. Shivmurat and others), under Section 11(1) U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.”
On perusal of the pleadings and material placed on record, this Court does not find any reason to expedite the case.
In view thereof, petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate expedite application. In the event, such an application is filed, it is expected the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 3.8.2021 P. Sri.
Harendra
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court