Ram Prasad v. State of U P and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mandamus to decide a revenue case pending before Tehsildar (Judicial) since 3.10.2019. Court found no reason to expedite and dismissed the petition.
Petitioner sought mandamus to decide a revenue case pending before Tehsildar (Judicial) since 3.10.2019. Court found no reason to expedite and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5643 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mathura Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
By the instant petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:
“ Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the case No. T201914360105944 under Section 35 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 situated in Village-Arsiya, Paragana- Aunguli, Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur, within stipulated period pending since 3.10.2019 before respondent No. 2, i.e., Tehsildar (Judicial), Shahganj, Tehsil- Shahganj, District-Jaunpur.”
On perusal of the pleadings and material placed on record, this Court does not find any reason to expedite the case.
In view thereof, petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate expedite application. In the event, such an application is filed, it is expected the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 P. Sri.
Ram Prasad
State Of U P
2 Others
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court