The Chief Justice's Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy, noting the existence of a statutory appeal available to the petitioner. No substantive relief was granted.
Writ petition dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 17
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34032 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ramakant Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Jitendra Prasad Mishra, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Chief Standing Counsel
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
It is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the relief sought in the present petition, petitioner has statutory alternative remedy of appeal. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain this writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Date :- 21.12.2021 Manish Himwan/P.Sri.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Ramakant
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
