Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23815 of 2021…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23815 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mahanth Hari Vishanu Das Chela Mahanth Mangal Das Alias Barjrang Bali Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Madan Mohan Srivastava
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Grievance is that nuisance is being created at petitioner's premises by private respondents.
Such issues can always be raised before the appropriate forum by taking recourse to Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Writ petition would not lie in such matters, at the first instance.
Leaving it open for the petitioner to pursue such remedy, the petition is consigned to records.
Order Date :- 24.11.2021 Bhaskar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable for grievance against nuisance created by private respondents.
Mangal Das A/k/a Barjrang Bali Shukla
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
