The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as petitioners failed to appear and press the petition regarding marriage registration.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23379 of 2020
Petitioner :- Shivani Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition.
Learned Standing Counsel is present.
It reflects from the record that the petitioners have not applied for registration of their marriage pursuant to the order of this Court dated 5.1.2021.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim protection, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 25.1.2021 Noman
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the writ petition proceeding in absence of the petitioner.
Shivani Pal and Another
State Of U P
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
