The petition was dismissed by the Single Judge as it was rendered infructuous and not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22316 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Nootan Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudha Pandey
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petition is rendered infructuous and he does not wish to press this petition.
Ms. Sudha Pandey, who has appeared for respondent no.3 has no objection if the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 4.10.2021 sfa/
Smt. Nootan Rani And Another
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
