The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution, observing that the remedy sought could alternatively be availed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
None. Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22066 of 2021
Petitioner :- Chhote Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
None appears for the petitioners even in the revised list.
Even otherwise remedy sought in the present writ petition can be availed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Writ petition accordingly is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.11.2021
n.u.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chhote Singh And 4 Others
State Of U P And 8 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
