Court dismissed the writ petition under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution, noting petitioners failed to apply for online marriage registration despite granted extensions.
Interim protection, if any, stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20765 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pinky And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sachin Kanaujiya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List of additional cases has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned Standing Counsel is present.
The record reflects that the petitioners have failed to apply for online registration of their marriage although twice the time was granted to them.
Under these circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim protection granted earlier, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 13.1.2021 S.P.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to failure to register marriage.
Pinky
State Of U.P.
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
