The High Court dismissed the written appeal for withdrawal by the petitioner, who had filed a Vakalatnama unsigned by the client. The court noted the missing signature report from the Stamp Reporter but allowed the withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1886 of 2021
Petitioner :- Harindra Khari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Sagar Dubey,Manoj Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Stamp Reporter has reported that Vakalatnama has not been signed by the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Sri Priyavrat Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Abishek Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 has no objection.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Order Date :- 25.1.2021 Manish Himwan
Harindra Khari
State Of U.P.
Naheed Ara Moonis
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
