The writ petition filed by Gyanendra and others against the State of U.P. was dismissed by the court as infructuous on 21.1.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1726 of 2021
Petitioner :- Gyanendra And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Yadav,Km Preete Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Nigam
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
At the very outset, Ms. Preete, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.1.2021 nd
Gyanendra And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Naheed Ara Moonis
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
