Petitioner failed to appear despite multiple opportunities, leading to dismissal of the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1377 of 2021
Petitioner :- Phool Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari,Ram Bilas Yadav,Sr. Advocate O.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
None for the petitioner even in the second round. Earlier also on 21.01.2021, no one appeared for the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Therefore, petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 15.3.2021 Kirti
(Jayant Banerji, J) (Sanjay Yadav, J)
Phool Chand
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Yadav
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
