Writ petition filed by Radhika Devi was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent and no fresh cases were pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10938 of 2021
Petitioner :- Radhika Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chitra Sen Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. None is present for the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned Standing Counsel is present for the respondent.
Learned Standing Counsel has also pointed out that the writ petition is not maintainable as it seeks a direction upon the private respondents not to interfere in the possession of the petitioner in respect of own private property.
Be that as it may, as the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present to pursue the petition, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 sfa/
Radhika Devi
State Of U.P.
Manoj Misra
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
