The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a mandamus for the respondent to decide a pending revenue case under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 within three months to address undue delay.
Petition disposed with direction to respondent-2 to decide the said case within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10134 of 2021
Petitioner :- Leena Rani Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Kaptanganj, District Kushi Nagar to decide afore-mentioned case, with all expedition without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy/computer generated copy of this order, which shall be filed by petitioner in above mentioned case by means of a Notary Affidavit.
Order Date :- 25.10.2021 Saif
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Hon'ble Court should issue a direction to the respondent to decide the pending revenue case within a fixed time period.
Whether the delay in disposal of the case can be attributed to the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Leena Rani
State Of U P
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
