A writ petition seeking restoration of entries of several khasra plots village Rara was filed. The respondent's counsel raised a preliminary objection regarding the petitioner's lack of locus standi, stating the remedy should be via Public Interest Litigation. The court accepted this objection and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 272 of 2021
Petitioner :- Suryabhan
Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jagat Narayan Mishra,Krishna Dutt Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order on Civil Misc. Substitution Application
Order on Writ Petition
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1 & 2 to restore the entry of Talab Khasra Plot No.686 area 0.3399 hectare and Talab Khasra Plot No.699/1 area 0.2433 hectare and Chak Road Khasra Plot No.697 area 0.50 hectare and Chak Road
Khasra Plot No.698 area 0.0100 hectare and Chak Road Khasra Plot No.701 area 0.0100 hectare situated in Village Rara, Post Umari, Pargana, Tehsil District Fatehpur"
Order Date :- 23.10.2021 Ravi/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the present writ petition.
Whether the respondents are liable to restore the entries of various khasra plots in the revenue records.
Suryabhan
Deputy Director Of Consolidation
2 Others
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
