Reena Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition is infructuous; the Hon'ble Court dismissed the petition without forming opinions on merits.
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition is infructuous; the Hon'ble Court dismissed the petition without forming opinions on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6755 of 2021 Petitioner :- Reena Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prateek Rai,Devid Kumar Singh,Satya Prakash Rai
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.7.2021/nd
Reena Pandey
State of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court