The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the matter between the parties was settled, citing non-response from the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60327 of 2011
Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Respondent :- Harish Kumar Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- Alok Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that his client is not responding and it appears that the matter has been settled between the parties.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.11.2021 Kushal
Narendra Kumar
Harish Kumar
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
