The single judge dismissed the revision petition, holding it barred by limitation. The court rejected the application for condonation of delay due to the absence of plausible grounds provided in the supporting affidavit.
C condonation of delay was rejected, and the revision stands dismissed as being barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 23 of 2019
Revisionist :- Nisha Khurana Opposite Party :- Kapil Sachdeva And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Atul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anurag Vajpeyi,Anurag Vajpeyi,Gaurav Tripathi
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
In Re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2019
List revised. No one is present on behalf of revisionist-applicant to press the application.
This revision is reported to be beyond time by 48 days.
I have perused the delay condonation application as well as the affidavit filed in support of the application.
No plausible ground has been given in the application for condoning the delay in filing the revision.
In view of said fact, delay condonation application is rejected.
In Re: Revision
The application for condonation of delay in filing the revision having been rejected vide order of date, the revision stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
Order Date :- 25.11.2021
V.S.Singh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition is maintainable being filed beyond the limitation period.
Whether the grounds for condonation of delay are plausible and acceptable.
Whether the revision application should be dismissed as barred by limitation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nisha Khurana
Kapil Sachdeva
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
