under the relevant Rules, the process of selection has been undertaken by the competent authority in pursuance of the relevant government order creating the additional post in the Institution. Thus, there existed no cogent reason for withholding the salary of the petitioner. Further submission is that in the impugned order, there is nothing about any illegality or irregularity in the appointment of the petitioner and in view thereof, there is no justification to refuse the claim of the petitioner as has been done by the impugned order, hence, the impugned order is wholly illegal and erroneous. Further submission is that in the impugned order, the Director has not pointed out any procedural irregularity but has referred the punishment awarded to Sri Surya Bali Dwivedi, the then officiating Principal of the College, which has no relation with the appointment of the petitioner made against duly sanctioned and vacant Class-IV posts. Further the impugned order does not disclose any illegality, infirmity or irregularity in the selection. Moreover, the version of the petitioner has not been considered. The State Government itself has taken disciplinary action against the then Director, who has passed the impugned order. Submission further is that in one of the similar matters in Writ-A No. 66584 of 2008 (Chandra Deo Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others), decided on 09th September, 2014 and Writ-A No.3730 of 2009 (Ajai Raj Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 03.04.2015, this Court has set aside the order of the Director and has remanded the matter back for reconsideration.
