This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition concerning railway employment. The court held the matter cognizable by the Central Administrative Tribunal and rejected the writ as maintainable on that basis.
The writ petition was dismissed due to the availability of a competent remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1872 of 2021 Petitioner :- Dilip Kumar Chakarvorty Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Fatma Khatoon Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondent regarding maintainability of the writ petition. The dispute raised herein is pertaining to an employment of Railways.
The matter is cognizable by a competent Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition is dismissed , in view of the said remedy.
Order Date :- 8.2.2021 P Kesari
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition regarding a railway employment dispute is maintainable despite the availability of Central Administrative Tribunal remedy.
Dilip Kumar Chakarvorty
Union Of India
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
