The petitioners were allowed to withdraw the writ petition and granted liberty to file a fresh petition after failing to disclose service details.
Leaves granted to withdraw petition with liberty to file fresh petition with requisite details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1864 of 2021 Petitioner :- Dayashankar Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sevak Yadav,Pankaj Roy Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh,Sanjay Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Mrigraj Singh, learned counsel for the BSA submits that the petitioners have not disclosed any of their service details like date of appointment, college/school in which they served and the institution from where they finally retired.
After some argument, Sri Ram Sevak Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition bringing on record the requisite details.
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file fresh petition.
Order Date :- 23.2.2021 Pravin
Dayashankar Yadav And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
