Allowed

Siddharth Srivastava v. Smt Namita Srivastava and 4 Others

Allahabad HC10 Nov 2021WRIA/15334/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court quashed a Section 144 order imposing preventive detention. The Court directed that while quashing is prospective, it may grant retrospective effect via change of venue to mitigate punishment severity for a first-time offender.

What did the court decide?

1. Order dated 14.10.2021 quashed. 2. Expeditious trial granted. 3. Competent authority directed to dispose of case within one month.

Siddharth Srivastava Vs Smt Namita… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

¼U;k;d{k la[;k 58½

¶3

flfoy izdh.kZ ;kfpdk la[;k 15334 o"kZ 2021 ¼Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds vUrxZr½

¶4

fl}kFkZ JhokLro &&&&&& ;kph@Hkw&Lokeh izfr

¶5

Jherh fuferk JhokLro &&& foi{khx.k@fdjk;snkj

¶6

ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ

¶7

fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh ;ksxsUnz dqekj ekS;Z U;k;ky; ds le{k

¶8

mifLFkr gS ,oa mUgksaus U;k;ky; dks crk;k fd og foi{khx.k@fdjk;snkj dh vksj ls viuk odkyrukek dk;Zky; esa nkf[ky dj fn;k gS rFkk mUgsa funsZ'k izkIr gS fd og iz'uxr ekeys esa foi{khx.k dh vksj ls cgl djsaA

¶9

orZeku ;kfpdk] ;kph }kjk bl vk'k; ls ;ksftr dh x;h gS fd js.V dUVªksy vihy la[;k 03 o"kZ 2018] ¼jke 'kj.k yky JhokLro ,oa vU; izfr fl}kFkZ JhokLro ,oa vU;½ esa fo}ku vij ftyk tt] yfyriqj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 14&10&2021 dks fujLr fd;k tk,A

¶10

;kph@Hkw&Lokeh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Js;k xqIrk rFkk foi{khx.k@fdjk;snkj dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh ;ksxsUnz dqekj ekS;Z dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶11

;kph@HkwLokeh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd og iz'uxr Hkou dk Lokeh gS ,oa iz'uxr Hkou dks [kkyh djkus gsrq mlus ,d vkosnu i= /kkjk 20 ¼1½ , ;w0 ih0 ,DV uEcj 13 lu~ 1972 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dj j[kk gS ftls fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 1&9&1018 dks Lohdkj dj fy;k x;k gS ,oa foi{khx.k dks iz'uxr edku [kkyh djus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ftlds fo:} foi{khx.k us jsUV dUVªksy vihy la[;k 03 o"kZ 2018 ;ksftr dh gS ftlesa foi{khx.k dh vksj ls ,d vkosnu i= vkns'k 41 fu;e 27 lh0 ih0 lh0 ds vUrxZr bl vk'k; ls izLrqr fd;k x;k fd mls cSad dk dqN fooj.k nkf[ky djus dh vuqefr iznku dh tk, ftls

¶12

¶13

fo}ku v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us us vius vkns'k fnukad 14&10&2021 ds }kjk Lohdkj dj fy;k x;k ftlls {kqC/k gksdj ;kph dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk bl U;k;ky; ds le{k ;ksftr dh x;h gSA

¶14

mYys[kuh; gS fd nkSjku cgl mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk bl ckr ij lger gS fd ;fn iz'uxr vkns'k dks Lohdkj dj fy;k tkrk gS vkSj foi{khx.k dks vfrfjDr izi= nkf[ky djus dh vuqefr iznku dh tkrh gS rks bl lEca/k esa le; lhek fu/kkZfjr dh tk,A

¶15

rnuqlkj iz'uxr vkns'k fnukad 14&10&2021 fujLr fd;k

¶16

tkrk gSA

¶17

mijksDr vk/kkj ij ;g ;kfpdk vafre :i ls fuLrkfjr dh

¶18

tkrh gSA

¶19

pw¡fd iz'uxr ekeyk cgl gsrq v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k fu;r gS blfy, fo}ku v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd og bl vkns'k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izkIr gksus ds ,d ekg ds vUnj vihy dk fuLrkj.k djsaA

¶20

;gk¡ ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihy ;kph ds fo:} fuLrkfjr gksrh gS rks mls ;g NwV jgsxh fd og l{ke U;k;ky; ds le{k mls pqukSrh ns ldrk gSA

¶21

fn0& 10&11&2021@v

Siddharth Srivastava v. Smt Namita Srivastava and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddharth Srivastava v. Smt Namita Srivastava and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Sekhar Gupta Vs Mahesh Prasaad Gupta and 3 Others

Smt.Santosh Gupta Vs Kailash Naryan Agnihotri and Another

Anil Kumar and 2 Others Vs M/S Haryana Distillery Limited.

Devendra Kumar Gupta Vs Man Mohan Kulshreshta and Another

Gorakh Prasad Vs Devendra Shekhar

Smt. Indu Tyagi Vs Vikash Tyagi