Sunil Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after the respondent QC stated the petitioner's grievance was ventilated and payment had already been made.
Writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after the respondent QC stated the petitioner's grievance was ventilated and payment had already been made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10753 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 Ravi/-
Sunil Kumar Sharma
State Of U.P.
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court