Single judge order dismissing the second appeal for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the matter. No inter se case to analyze.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 305 of 2016
Appellant :- Kali Prasad And Another Respondent :- Swami Nath And 5 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Y.S. Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Ishwar Kumar Upadhyay
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised. No one is present on behalf of appellants to press this appeal.
Sri I.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondents is present.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.11.2021 V.S.Singh
Kali Prasad
Swami Nath
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
