Indian Bank v. Raj Kumar Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 70 of 2021…
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 70 of 2021…
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 70 of 2021
Revisionist :- Indian Bank Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Revisionist :- Pashupati Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Nikhil Kumar
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised. No one appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press the appeal. Sri Nikhil Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.11.2021 SK Goswami
Indian Bank
Raj Kumar Gupta
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court