The court dismissed a habeas corpus writ petition filed for the release of the petitioner as infructuous on the grounds that the writ petition had become so by the passage of time.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 21 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State - respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous by passage to time.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 18.2.2021/vkg
Smt. Rani And Another
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
