Court allowed condonation of delay in filing an appeal. Subsequently, the appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous on the submission by the appellant's counsel.
Delay condoned; appeal disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 460 of 1995
Appellant :- Umesh Chand Respondent :- Smt. Madhubala Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Mullick
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application
This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
Cause shown is sufficient.
Delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
This application, accordingly, stands allowed.
Order on Appeal
Delay having been condoned.
It is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that this petition has become infructuous.
Hence, this appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.12.2021 Mukesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone delay in filing the appeal and whether the appeal has become infructuous.
Umesh Chand
Smt. Madhubala
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
