Appeal was dismissed as it stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 14.12.2021. Counsel for the appellant was absent while the respondent was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 375 of 2011
Appellant :- Smt. Jasveer Kaur And Anr. Respondent :- New Okhla Industrial Development Authority And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Sharad Mandhyan Counsel for Respondent :- Saurabh Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J. Hon'ble Ajai Tyagi,J.
Called in revise.
Sri Sharad Mandhayan, learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 DKS
Smt. Jasveer Kaur
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
Ajai Tyagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
