This criminal revision was dismissed as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court vacated any interim orders and allowed parties to move appropriate applications within six weeks if the matter survives.
The criminal revision was dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated; parties can move appropriate application within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 258 of 1998
Revisionist :- Shrimati Maya Devi Opposite Party :- Resumeof U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Ajai Singh,P.K.Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None present on behalf of revisionist. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from the record that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it will be open for the parties to move appropriate application within six weeks' from today, if the matter survives.
Order Date :- 27.11.2021 shiv
Shrimati Maya Devi
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
