Disposed

Ajay Tiwari and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC27 Nov 2021A482/19960/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court fixed the disposal of the Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code application for single judge consideration on 17.1.2021. It adjourned the matter to determine if the Sessions Court should decide or refer the application to the High Court.

What did the court decide?

The application is reserved for the Single Judge to decide based on the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court.

Ajay Tiwari and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 77

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19960 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Ajay Tiwari And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Singh Yadav,Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 04 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 498,] 323] 504] 506] 406] 354, Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk efgyk Fkkuk] ftyk bykgkckn ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 260 lu 2020] esa ,0lh0ts0,e0] 17] bykgkckn }kjk ikfjr rych vkns’k fn0 8&1&2021 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; lqyg le>kSrk gks tkus dh laHkkouk gS] blfy, bl izdj.k dks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds lqyg le>kSrk dsUnz dks jsQj dj fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks mudk ;g vuqjks/k Lohdkj fd, tkus esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA

¶9

ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr bl izdj.k esa ;g funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd nksuksa i{kdkj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj ekeys dks lqyg le>kSrk ds }kjk fuLrkfjr djus ds fy, vkosnu i= izLrqr djsaA ;fn izdj.k dks lqyg le>kSrk ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr djus ds laca/k esa vkosnu i= voj U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnu i= izLrqr fd, tkus dh frfFk ls ,d lIrkg ds vUnj ml ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tk; rFkk lacaf/kr ehfM,s’ku lsUVj }kjk mls 4 ekg ds vUnj fuLrkfjr dj fn;k tk;A

¶10

vkt ls 5 ekg rd vkosndx.k ds fo:) mijksDr okn esa leLr vfxze dk;Zokgh LFkfxr jgsxhA

¶11

;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k foQy gksrh gS rks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; mijksDr okn esa vkosndx.k ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj fof/kd dk;Zokgh djus dks Lora= gS] vkSj ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k lQy gksrh gS rks vkosndx.k ehfM,s’ku lsUVj dh ml vk[;k ds lkFk bl U;k;ky; esa vkus dks Lora= gSaA

¶12

mijksDr vH;qfDr ds lkFk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶13

fn0 % 27&11&2021 ds0lh0flag

Ajay Tiwari and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Tiwari and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhure Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Meharban Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Prabhash Chandra Garg and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Raj Bahadur and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shrimati Maya Devi Vs Resumeof U.P.

Neeraj @ Neetu and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another