Dismissed
Smt. Husna Ara v. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad HCCRLRD/164/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. -…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 164 of 2006
Revisionist :- Smt. Husna Ara Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shahabuddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.S.Shukla,Shailendra Sharma
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Re: Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.
None has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State/Opposite Party.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
There is delay of 1560 days in filing the present revision and none has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application moreover grounds shown in the affidavit are not sufficient to condone the delay caused in filing the revision.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-
. . .
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 164 of 2006
Revisionist :- Smt. Husna Ara Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shahabuddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,R.S.Shukla,Shailendra Sharma
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Since delay condonation application has been rejected, consequently the revision is also dismissed.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 28.7.2021 MN/-
Smt. Husna Ara
State of U.P.
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court