The High Court in a Criminal Revision disposed of the matter by quashing an earlier anticipatory bail section and dismissing the petitionist's appeal against conviction, relying on ex-parte consent.
The criminal revision dismissed; antecedent court order quashed; appellate court order quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3241 of 2012
Revisionist :- Vijay Gupta And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Kartikeya Saran Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
lwph iqujhf{krA
vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh fuxjkuh] QkStnkjh okn la0 793 lu 2009] LVsV olsZl fot; dqekj ,.M ,uvnj esa esVzksiksfyfVu eftLVzsV] d{k la0 9] dkuiqj uxj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 5&4&2010 ,oa QkStnkjh vihy la0 132 lu 2010] fot; xqIrk ,.M ,uvnj olsZl LVsV vkQ ;w0 ih0 esa vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] dksVZ ua0 9] dkuiqj uxj }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 25&9&2012 dks vikLr djokus gsrq ;ksftr dh x;h gSA
fuxjkuhdrkZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fuxjkuhdrkZx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgksaus rFkkdfFkr dksbZ ?kVuk dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vfHk0 lk{kh la0 1 ds c;ku ,oa fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k vk[;k esa dkQh fojks/kkHkk"k gSA bl izdj.k esa fuxjkuhdrkZx.k dks 6&6 ekg ds dkjkokl ,oa :0 500@& 500@& vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fuxjkuhdrkZx.k tekur ij gSaA ?kVuk o"kZ 1995 dh gS] fuxjkuhdrkZx.k yxHkx 58&59 o"kZ ds gks pqds gSsa] blfy, okn dh leLr ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, iz’uxr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k dks vikLr dj fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us bldk ?kksj izfrjks/k fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dks lquk rFkk i=koyh ,oa iz’uxr fu.kZ;ksa dk ifj’khyu
fd;kA
fo}ku egkuxj eftLVzsV }kjk fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k fn0 5&4&2010 ikfjr djrs le; mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ,oa lk{;ksa ij xgurkiwoZd fopkj fd;k x;k gS rFkk mDr vkns’k ds vUr esa muds }kjk ;g dgk x;k gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k ;g lkfcr djus esa iw.kZr% vlQy jgk gS fd okfnuh eqdnek dk vfHk;qDrx.k dh ijpwu dh nqdku ls :0 1200@& dk m/kkj Fkk] ftlds lEcU/k esa fookn gqvk ,oa okfnuh }kjk >wBk eqdnek vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) fy[kk;k x;k gSA bl izdkj vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 323 Hkk0na0fo0 ds vUrxZr nks"kfl) ikrs gq, 6&6 ekg ds dkjkokl ,oa ikWp&ikWp lkS :i;s vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;kA bl fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k ds fo:) vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk nkf.Md vihy la0 132 lu 2010 ;ksftr dh x;h] ftl ij fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; us voj U;k;ky; dh i=koyh eWxkdj rFkk mHk; i{k dks lk{; dk leqfpr volj iznku djus ds mijkUr leLr rF;ksa dh leqfpr foospuk djus ds mijkUr] ,d foLr`r fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k ikfjr djrs gq, nkf.Md vihy fujLr djrs gq, voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns’k dh iqf"V fd;k] ftlesa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS rFkk ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk nksuksa voj U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’kksa dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA
vUrfje vkns’k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls lekIr le>k tk;A
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks
vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA
fn0 % 26&07&2021 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the conviction and sentencing order.
Whether to quash the antecedent criminal appeal.
Vijay Gupta
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
