The judgment reiterates that bail is an exceptional right not a matter of right. It explains that an order without substantial reasons cannot be left un-settled until future applications are filed.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 108 of 2018
Revisionist :- Akmal Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ajai Kumar,Ajay Kumar(A),Vivek Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Radhey Shyam Shukla
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
lwph iqujhf{krA
mHk; i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA foi{kh la0 1 dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
lwph iqujhf{kr djk;s tkus ij Hkh bl okn ij fdlh ds mifLFkr u gksus ds dkj.k ;g QkStnkjh fuxjkuh vne iSjoh esa fujLr dh tkrh gSA
bl okn esa ;fn dksbZ vUrfje vkns’k gks rks mls fujLr ekuk tk;A
;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn Hkfo"; esa bl okn dks iquLFkkZfir djus gsrq dksbZ vkosnu i= fn;k tkrk gS rks mls bl U;k;ihB ls lac) u ekurs gq, mi;qDr U;k;ihB ds le{k lwphc) fd;k tk,xk D;ksafd bl okn dks xq.k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij ugha fujLr fd;k x;k gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k ls lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks rRdky voxr djk;k tk;A
fn0 % 23&07&2021 ds0lh0flag
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the revisionist Akmal Khan under Section 437 CrPC.
Whether the High Court's order was passed without adequate reasons under Article 226.
Akmal Khan
State Of U.P.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
