Dismissed
Arvind Yadav (Minor) v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCCRLR/1529/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1529 of 2019…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1529 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1529 of 2019
Revisionist :- Arvind Yadav (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pradeep Kumar,Anuj Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
This revision has been filed seeking the quashing of order dated 19.11.2018 passed by Special Judge S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, Fatehpur as well as order dated 30.08.2016 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehpur in Case Crime No.66/16, under section 342, 302, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(2)5 of S.C./S.T. Act, P.S.Hathgawn, District- Fatehpur.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A.
The perusal of the grounds taken by the applicant do not show any such good ground which may persuade this Court to interfere in the impugned orders. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned orders. There is no illegality or infirmity in the said orders. The concerned court while passing the impugned orders has considered the entire evidence available on record. Further, the plea raised by the learned counsel for the applicants before this Court may be raised before the court concerned at appropriate stage. This court does not see any element of perversity in the impugned orders. There also does not appear to be any such abuse of court's process which may persuade this Court to interfere in the impugned order which is a reasoned one.
The application lacks merit and is hereby, dismissed. However, the applicant may seek proper remedy before appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
Order Date :- 17.11.2021 shiv
Arvind Yadav (Minor)
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court