Disposed

Savitri Devi @ Javitri Devi v. State of Up and Others

Allahabad HC23 Dec 2021CRLP/8817/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court disposed of the appeal for quashing an FIR and preventing the petitioner's arrest, applying guidelines from a prior judgment regarding arrest procedures for offences carrying seven years or less punishment.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR dated 04.8.2021 and protection against arrest granted by applying prior guidelines.

Savitri Devi @ Javitri Devi Vs State of Up and Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 47

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8817 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Savitri Devi @ Javitri Devi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Singh,Manish Tripathi,Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State respondents.

¶6

The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 04.8.2021 registered as Case Crime No.783 of 2021 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 496 IPC, Police Station Modinagar, District Ghaziabad. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioner in the aforesaid case.

¶7

The submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgement of this Court dated 28.01.2021 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.17732 of 2020 ( Vimal Kumar and 3 others vs. State of UP and 3 others) in which guidelines have been framed following the judgement of the Apex Court in different cases, relating to offences providing punishment of seven years or less.

¶8

We have gone through the impugned first information report and we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by this Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.

¶9

Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of judgement dated 28.01.2021 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.17732 of 2020 Vimal Kumar and 3 others vs. State of UP and 3 others.

¶10

Order Date :- 23.12.2021 RKP

¶11

Digitally signed by JUSTICE Digitally signed by SUBHASH MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI VIDYARTHI Date: 2021.12.24 09:59:02 IST Date: 2021.12.24 10:00:11 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad

Savitri Devi @ Javitri Devi v. State of Up and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savitri Devi @ Javitri Devi v. State of Up and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Saini and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Himanshu Kaushik and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Balram and 3 Others Vs State of U P and 2 Others

Abhayraj Gupta Vs Superintendent,Central Jail

Mohd. Akram Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vivek Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others