Mohd. Akram v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15392 of 2020 Petitioner :- Mohd. Akram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Tomar,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause of filing the writ petition no more survives and the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 RKP
Mohd. Akram
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court