Smt. Nikita and Another v. State of U. P
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR under Section 366 IPC. The court directed the petitioner to record her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and prohibited coercive action against them for two weeks.
What did the court decide?
No coercive action against petitioners for two weeks; direction to record statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.