Dismissed

Reeta and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC28 Sept 2021CRLP/5568/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The high court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR and a stay on arrest. The court directed recording of statement and age determination under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and stayed coercive action for three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to record statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and conduct age determination; coercive action stayed for three weeks.

Reeta and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 47

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5568 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Reeta And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anand Prakash Srivastava

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Shri Anand Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant-respondent No. 3.

¶6

Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 27.6.2021 being Case Crime No. 224 of 2021 under Sections 363, 366 IPC, P.S. Gajraulla, District Pilibhit and for a direction to respondents not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to aforesaid FIR.

¶7

Both the petitioners have stated that they are major and have married with each other out of their own free will and as such no offence under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C. are made out.

¶8

Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner No.1 to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned for recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., within a week from today. In the event the petitioner No.1 appears before the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned within the stipulated period, the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned shall record her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and also ensure medical examination for age determination of petitioner no.1 and shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶9

For a period of three weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.

¶10

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioner alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.

¶11

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the

¶12

official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶13

Order Date :- 28.9.2021 Jaswant

Reeta and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reeta and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Prakash Singh Vs State of U.P. and Others

Yogendra Pratap Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Suresh Chandra Tiwari and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Savitri Devi Vs State of U P and 2 Others

Manish Rai Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kunj Bihari Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others